USPTO serial 88057586
PLAYRZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OAKES, ANNA JENNIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLAYRZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Thornhill Ontario, CA
Thornhill Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ashley N. Barendse
ASHLEY N BARENDSE DUNLAP BENNETT & LUDWIG PLLC211 CHURCH ST SELEESBURG, VA 20175UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Golf balls, golf clubs, golf bags and stands; basketballs, footballs, soccer balls, volleyballs, tennis balls, racquetballs, squash balls, handballs, baseballs, softballs; tennis racquets, racquetball racquets, squash racquets, badminton racquets; tennis, squash and racquetball racquet bumpers, grommets, grips, strings and covers; baseball and softball gloves, bats, and bat bags; Basketball hoops; toys, namely, balls for sports, balls for games, nets for games, nets for sports, hoops for sports, hoops for games | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2019 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |