USPTO serial 88061812
ARMOR ANYWHERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2021
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ARMOR ANYWHERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richardson, TX, US
Richardson, TX, US
Richardson, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danielle D. Janitch
Danielle D. Janitch Osborn Maledon, P.A.2929 N. Central Ave., Ste. 2100Phoenix, AZ 85012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for use in connection with data security, computer security, cybersecurity, software security, and prevention of computer risks; Downloadable software for detecting, monitoring, managing, and protection and defense against and response to data, computer network, and cyber breaches, threats, and invasions; all of the foregoing for use in connection with IT systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing information and online information in the fields of computer security, Internet security, data security, cybersecurity, information technology, computer systems, virtualization technologies, cloud computing and computing solutions and systems, datacenter architecture, and enterprise architecture; Computer security services, namely, providing security and anonymity for electronically transmitted protected health information, credit card and banking transactions; Computer security services, namely, identification of cyber threats through multi-source threat intelligence and analysis, development of mitigation strategies to minimize risk of computer system infection and data exfiltration, remote configuration of pre-integrated security tools to protect computer software and electronic data from viruses and cyber security threats, and infrastructure and security tool notification and configuration to return infrastructure to compliant state, all of the foregoing being for data, programming, equipment and software purposes; computer security services, namely, host-based intrusion detection services; Secure hosting of digital content on the internet and secure website hosting; Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, protecting, administration, and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; Technical consulting, analysis, advisory, support, and managed security services in the fields of computer security, Internet security, data security, cybersecurity, information technology, computer systems, virtualization technologies, cloud computing and computing solutions and systems, datacenter architecture, and enterprise architecture; Managed security services and computer security services in the nature of detecting, testing, analyzing, and managing and implementing countermeasures and mitigation strategies and tools against data, computer network, and cyber breaches, threats, and invasions; Planning, designing, integration, configuration, implementation, and management of information technology (IT) systems, and virtualization, cloud-based, and cloud-computing systems and technologies; Software as a service (SAAS), platform as a service (PAAS), and infrastructure as a service (IAAS) featuring software platforms and technical support for the protection and defense against and response to data, computer network, and cyber breaches, threats, and invasions; Internet Protocol (IP) address verification services; all of the foregoing for use in connection with IT systems | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Armor Defense Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Armor Defense Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Armor Defense Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ARMOR ANYWHERE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2021 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 16, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |