USPTO serial 88062222
SOLOTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEAUDRY-TORRES, FAITH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOLOTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cabinets for loudspeakers; Car televisions; Digital video recorders; Earphones; Time recording apparatus; Transmitters of electronic signals; Wireless chargers; Car video recorders; Electric and electronic video surveillance installations; In-car telephone handset cradles | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2018 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |