Drawing for BEAN BLOSSOM

USPTO serial 88064160

BEAN BLOSSOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAN BLOSSOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TYLER B DROSTE

TYLER B DROSTE GUTWEIN LAW200 S MERIDIAN STREET, SUITE 420INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46225UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee; but not including alcoholic beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 19, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 29, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 30, 2020GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2020GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2020CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 13, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 2, 2019RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Dec 2, 2019RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2019RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Nov 18, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 8, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 8, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 8, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 9, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 9, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance