USPTO serial 88064929
PECAN BAYOU ENERGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAGLIARDI, JEANINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PECAN BAYOU ENERGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bobby W. Braxton
BOBBY W BRAXTON BRAXTON PERRONE PLLC5000 LEGACY DRIVE SUITE 465PLANO, TX 75024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Drilling of deep oil or gas wells; Drilling of wells; Extraction of oil and gas; Extraction of natural gas; Oil and gas drilling; Well improvement services, namely, hydraulic fracturing of subsurface geologic formations to enhance well production; Laying and construction of pipelines; Oil and gas pipeline construction; Oil and gas pipeline maintenance; Pipeline construction and maintenance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 1, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 2, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 16, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |