USPTO serial 88064984
PROMINENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROMINENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
JEFFREY B. SLADKUS, ESQ. THE SLADKUS LAW GROUP1397 CARROLL DRIVEATLANTA, GA 30318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Textiles and textile goods, not included in other classes; Bed covers; Table covers; Glass cloths; Face towels; Towels of textile; Bath linen, except clothing; Linens; Bed linen; Table linen, not of paper; Diapered linen; Brocades; Calico; Canvas for tapestry or embroidery; Tablemats of textile; Haircloth; Bed covers; Bed covers of paper; Travelling rugs; Curtain holders of textile material; Bed linen; Dimity; Cotton fabrics; Crepe; Crepon; Damask; Labels of textile; Handkerchiefs of textile; Pillowcases; Mattress covers; Felt; Sanitary flannel; Flannel; Hat linings, of textile, in the piece; Coverings for furniture; Cushion covers; Shams; Fitted toilet lid covers of fabric; Linings; Flags of textile or plastic; Gauze; Bath mitts; Jersey; Cheviots; Bed sheets; Marabouts; Filtering materials of textile; Plastic material; Textile material; Drugget; Billiard cloth; Printers' blankets of textile; Wall hangings of textile; Eiderdowns; Door curtains; Tick; Furniture coverings of plastic; Furniture coverings of textile; Sleeping bags; Textile coasters; Bunting of textile or plastic; Bolting cloth; Banners of textile or plastic; Woven fabrics; Lining fabric for footwear; Woollen fabric; Fabric, impervious to gases, for aeronautical balloons; Table runners; Shrouds; Taffeta; Tablecloths, not of paper; Moleskin; Hemp cloth; Printed calico cloth; Ticks; Oilcloth for use as tablecloths; Gummed cloth, other than for stationery purposes; Cheese cloth; Buckram; Curtains of textile or plastic; Shower curtains of textile or plastic; Fabrics; Adhesive fabric for application by heat; Hemp fabric; Jute fabric; Flax fabrics; Rayon fabric; Ramie fabric; Silk cloth; Silk fabrics for printing patterns; Esparto fabric; Elastic woven material; Fabric of imitation animal skins; Fiberglass fabrics, for textile use; Knitted fabric; Non-woven textile fabrics; Upholstery fabrics; Fabric for footwear; Lingerie fabric; Fabrics for textile use; Traced cloths for embroidery; Chenille fabric; Frieze; Place mats, not of paper; Textile napkins; Napkins, of cloth, for removing make-up; Trellis; Quilts; Tulle; Velvet; Curtains; Mosquito nets; Zephyr | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |