USPTO serial 88070497
MAXIMIZED STILLAGE CO-PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 19, 2020
- Examiner
- NKOJO, RHODA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MAXIMIZED STILLAGE CO-PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Springfield, OH
Springfield, OH
Fluid Quip Process Technologies, LLC
Springfield, OH
Other trademarks owned by Fluid Quip Process Technologies, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn E. Smith
Kathryn E. Smith WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLP441 Vine Street2700 Carew TowerCincinnati, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting in the field of engineering; Engineering design services, all in the area of processes and equipment used in grain wet and dry milling, pulp and paper production, and biochemical or bio-fuel production, including alcohol production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fluid Quip Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Fluid Quip Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Fluid Quip Process Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MAXIMIZED STILLAGE CO-PRODUCTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2020 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 3, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |