CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for REKT

USPTO serial 88070906

REKT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REKT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Damon Ashcraft

J. DAMON ASHCRAFT SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 E. VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for trading crypto-productsACTIVE—
036Financial services, namely, banking and investment of funds services, currency exchange services, electronic funds transfer services; futures and mutual funds brokerageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 27, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 26, 2019GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 26, 2019GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 26, 2019CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 4, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2018TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Sep 13, 2018PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance