CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for RDT

USPTO serial 88072106

RDT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIEBL, ALEXANDRA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RDT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark G. Chretien

Mark G. Chretien GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP1000 LOUISIANA STREET, SUITE 1700HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Industrial technology consulting services in the field of temperature analysis and optimization of catalyst activity associated fluid distribution within industrial process unitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2022EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2022EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 17, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 18, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 4, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 2, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2020NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 23, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 2, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 13, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 15, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 20, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 20, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 7, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 7, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 7, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 7, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 7, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance