Drawing for REVOLVE

USPTO serial 88077975

REVOLVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOO, JEANE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with REVOLVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keri Ann K. S. Krzykowski, 60603

KERI ANN K. S. KRZYKOWSKI, 60603 CADES SCHUTTE A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP1000 BISHOP STREET12TH FLOORHONOLULU, HI 96813

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for use in agriculture, namely, pre-planting processing equipment for seeds, namely, seed treatment machines, conveyance machines, mixing machines, coating machines and drying machines; containers for use with agricultural machines, namely, mechanical discharging hoppers for seedsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 10, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 6, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 23, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 13, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 10, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 6, 2019ZZBXALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION—
Feb 7, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance