Drawing for NYMPHS OF CLARELLA

USPTO serial 88079246

NYMPHS OF CLARELLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROTH, BENJAMIN H.
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NYMPHS OF CLARELLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL F KRIEGER

MICHAEL F KRIEGER KIRTON MCCONKIE36 SOUTH STATE STREET SUITE 1900KEY BANK TOWERSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 20, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 20, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 6, 2021EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 2, 2021RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Feb 9, 2021GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2021GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2021CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 9, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 31, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 31, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 29, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 29, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 29, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 17, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance