USPTO serial 88079427
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey C. Katz
Jeffrey C. Katz DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1675 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Virtual private network hardware and software for identity theft protection, fraud prevention and cybersecurity; downloadable computer software for identity theft protection, fraud prevention and cybersecurity; mobile applications for identity theft protection, fraud prevention and cybersecurity | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Credit card registration services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Credit reporting services; fraud resolution assistance services, namely, assistance with restoring credit damaged by identity theft | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing virtual private network services, namely, private and secure electronic communications services; providing electronic transmission of secure email; secure transmission of data by means of telecommunication networks, wireless communication networks and the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) services featuring computer software platforms for identity theft protection, fraud prevention and cybersecurity; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring computer software platforms for identity theft protection, fraud prevention and cybersecurity; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for identity theft protection, fraud prevention and cybersecurity; providing a website that features technology that enables the secure exchange of information by users and for purposes of identity theft protection; Computer security consultation services in the fields of identity theft for identity theft protection, fraud prevention and cybersecurity; computer security services, namely, providing an alerting service which tracks financial information about members to monitor, prevent, identify and detect and identify fraud; computer security services, namely, electronic monitoring services for computer security in the field of identity theft protection, fraud protection and cybersecurity; computer security threat analysis for protecting data, namely, facilitating provision of secure web browsers by monitoring and analyzing threats for security purposes; computer security services in the nature of providing online monitoring of credit reports to protect data and information from unauthorized access, namely, to facilitate the detection and prevention of identity theft and fraud; fraud detection services in the field of consumer identity theft prevention, namely, electronic monitoring of online data for protecting data and information from unauthorized access; providing an interactive website featuring technology that enables users to access and monitor their credit reports and financial information; providing a website featuring online non-downloadable software that enables users to access and monitor their credit reports and financial information | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Legal consultation services in the field of identity theft for identity theft protection, fraud prevention and cybersecurity; legal services in the nature of fraud resolution assistance services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2018 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |