Drawing for BRONZE BABE

USPTO serial 88081236

BRONZE BABE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EUBANK, REBECCA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRONZE BABE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Francis John Ciaramella, Esquire

FRANCIS JOHN CIARAMELLA FRANCIS JOHN CIARAMELLA PLLC110 FRONT ST STE 300JUPITER, FL 33477UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Sunless self-tanning preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 20, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 20, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 5, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 7, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 10, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 24, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 20, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 20, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 20, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 20, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 20, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 20, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance