Drawing for LIFEGUARD POSITIONING SYSTEM

USPTO serial 88083075

LIFEGUARD POSITIONING SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LIFEGUARD POSITIONING SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce J . Wolstoncroft

Bruce J . Wolstoncroft SAXTON & STUMP280 GRANITE RUN DRIVE, SUITE 300Suite 300LANCASTER, PA 17601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045Providing advice in the field of public safety using a system of determining proper positioning of lifeguard stations to minimize the risk of drowningACTIVESep 7, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 22, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 22, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2020GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jan 8, 2020GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jan 8, 2020CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Dec 19, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2019AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2019IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 20, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2019AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 14, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 13, 2019EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2019AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2019PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 19, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2018CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 12, 2018GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2018GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2018CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Oct 12, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance