USPTO serial 88083129
HUMCLIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHAUD-KING, JILLIAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUMCLIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M. COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C.80 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUETHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOSSINING, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Electronic platform as a services (PAAS), software as a service (SAAS) and cloud computing, all allowing access to several professionals and multiple clients and all featuring software for the provision of a virtual online office in the nature of a platform for professionals to communicate with clients, for management of agendas and appointments, for processing electronic payments, for screen sharing, for encrypted calls, and for a consent and electronic signature mechanism | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 4, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 4, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |