Drawing for SPARK NEURO

USPTO serial 88084627

SPARK NEURO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPARK NEURO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sarah I. Cohen

Sarah I. Cohen Lombard & Geliebter LLP305 Broadway Fl 7New York, NY 10007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Technology software, namely, downloadable software for measuring a person's emotion and attention levels for the purpose of assessing audience engagementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 12, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 29, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 3, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 3, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 3, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 3, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 30, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance