USPTO serial 88085646
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rosezena J. Pierce, Esq.
Rosezena J. Pierce, Esq. R.J. Pierce Law Group, P.C.205 N. Michigan Ave.SUITE 810Chicago, IL 60601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty balm creams; Beauty creams; Beauty creams for body care; Beauty lotions; Beauty milks; Beauty serums; Beauty soap; Body scrub; Body scrubs; Cosmetics; Foundations; Make-up; Make-up preparations; Make-up removing preparations; Make-up sets; Moisturizing body lotions; Moisturizing creams; Moisturizing milk; Moisturizing milks; Moisturizing preparations for the skin; Bar soap; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Face and body beauty creams; Facial beauty masks; Facial concealer; Facial moisturizers; Make-up foundation; Make-up foundations; Make-up primer; Make-up primers; Non-medicated skin toners; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Skin moisturizer; Skin moisturizer masks; Skin moisturizers used as cosmetics; Skin soap; Tinted makeup moisturizers | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2017 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| May 28, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |