Drawing for TVU MATRIX

USPTO serial 88086480

TVU MATRIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHAUD-KING, JILLIAN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TVU MATRIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas M. McAllister

DOUGLAS M. MCALLISTER LIPSITZ & MCALLISTER, LLC755 MAIN STREET, BUILDING 8MONROE, CT 06468UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009encoders; transceivers; IP video transceivers; video servers; IP video servers; video distribution system comprising network switches, routers, video servers, transceivers, encoders and downloadable software for distribution of video content; downloadable software for use in acquiring, indexing, producing, scheduling, routing and distribution of video contentACTIVE—
038video transmission over digital networks, namely, switching and routing of video over digital networks; video transmission and distribution over digital networksACTIVE—
041video and media production services, namely, compiling inventories of video content for others for video production purposesACTIVE—
042providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in acquiring, indexing, producing, scheduling, routing and distribution of video content; providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for use in acquiring, indexing, producing, scheduling, routing and distribution of video content; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in acquiring, indexing, producing, scheduling, routing and distribution of video contentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 28, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 6, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 11, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 3, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 2, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2019GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2019GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2019EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Apr 22, 2019CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 20, 2018GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 20, 2018GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 20, 2018CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 6, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance