USPTO serial 88086992
TINABAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOPKINS, SARAH COLLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TINABAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn Jennison Shultz
Kathryn Jennison Shultz JENNISON & SHULTZ, P.C.3918 Prosperity Avenue, Suite 215Fairfax, VA 22031UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruit-, nut-, and seed-based meal replacement bars; Fruit-, nut-, and seed-based snack bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2023 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |