USPTO serial 88087185
CH CLÉMENT & HILTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CH CLÉMENT & HILTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South El Monte, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Earrings; Jewelry; Jewelry and imitation jewelry; Jewelry armoires; Jewelry boxes; Jewelry brooches; Jewelry cases; Jewelry chains; Jewelry charms; Jewelry findings; Jewelry for the head; Jewelry pins for use on hats; Jewelry ring holders; Jewelry stickpins; Jewelry watches; Jewelry, namely, amulets; Jewelry, namely, anklets; Jewelry, namely, arm cuffs; Jewelry, namely, collar tips of common metal; Jewelry, namely, collar tips of precious metal; Jewelry, namely, magnetic necklaces; Jewelry, namely, magnetic pendants; Jewelry, namely, stone pendants; Key chains; Key chains for use as jewellery; Key chains for use as jewelry; Key chains of precious metal; Necklaces; Ankle bracelets; Bangle bracelets; Bead bracelets; Beads for making jewelry; Bib necklaces; Body jewelry; Bracelets; Bronze jewelry; Brooches; Charm bracelets; Charms for jewelry; Charms for key chains; Charms for key rings or key chains; Charms for collar jewelry and bracelet; Children's jewelry; Choker necklaces; Clasps for jewelry; Clip earrings; Costume jewelry; Cuff bracelets; Drop earrings; Gemstone jewelry; Gold-plated earrings; Hat jewelry; Hoop earrings; Imitation leather key chains; Jewelry clips for adapting pierced earrings to clip-on earrings; Jewelry, namely, bracelets, wristbands and necklaces that also provides notification to the wearer of a pending medical related task; Key chains comprised of split rings with decorative fobs or trinkets; Leather key chains; Memorial jewelry; Metal key chains; Necklace and earring combinations that can be worn separately or as one piece; Non-metal and non-leather key chains; Nylon bracelets; Nylon ankle bracelets; Pierced earrings; Pins being jewelry; Plastic bracelets in the nature of jewelry; Plastic key chains; Rhinestones for making jewelry; Rings; Rings being jewelry; Stainless steel jewelry bracelets; Wedding rings; Women's jewelry | PARTIALLY PAID | Jan 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2018 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |