Drawing for GINSU SCIENCE

USPTO serial 88087792

GINSU SCIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GINSU SCIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL CHRISTIAN WHITTICAR

MICHAEL CHRISTIAN WHITTICAR NOVA IP LAW PLLC155 Broadview Avenue, Suite 200Warrenton, VA 20186UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for manipulating visual perceptionACTIVEMay 19, 2015
042Consulting in the field of engineering; design, development and implementation of software; research and development of computer software; scientific research consulting in the field of visual perceptionACTIVEJan 1, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 16, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 16, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 18, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2022CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2022SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 11, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 25, 2022IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 25, 2022EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 25, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2022TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 25, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 26, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 25, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 2021TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Apr 12, 2021OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 12, 2021OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 31, 2019OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 11, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 30, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance