Drawing for CANAX

USPTO serial 88091538

CANAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DANTZLER, LAUREN ALEXANDRIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott M. Lowry

Scott M. Lowry LOWRY BLIXSETH APC23632 CALABASAS ROAD, STE. 201CALABASAS, CA 91302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Moisturizing creams; Facial creams; Lip cream; Body creams; Hand creams; Skin creams; Face and body creams; Skin creams in liquid and solid; Moisturizing body lotions; Skin lotion; Body lotions; Hand lotions; Face and body lotions; Lip balm; all of the foregoing containing CBD derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basisACTIVE—
021Applicators sold empty for applying cosmetic lotions for skin, face, and bodyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 26, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 31, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 14, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2020GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2020GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2020EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Feb 7, 2020CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance