USPTO serial 88091616
AMA AMA NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, DANYTHE ELIZABETH HA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMA AMA NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Managed Services Provider (MSP) in the computer field, namely, outsource service provider in the field of IT system management, IT system support in the nature of maintenance of computer software, integration of computer systems, monitoring of the computer systems for breakdown, quality control, and the technological functions of computer network systems, and IT system implementation, cloud computing, computer systems networking in the nature of maintenance of computer network software, integration of computer networks, monitoring of the computer networks for breakdown, quality control, and the technological functions of the computer network, computer workstation and server support in the nature of server software maintenance, hardware and software integration, IT telecommunication technology consultancy, IT telecommunication technology implementation, IT telecommunication technology remote and onsite management, IT telecommunication technology support in the nature of telecommunication technology software maintenance; Computer consulting services in the field of computers in the nature of IT system management, IT system support in the nature of maintenance of computer software, integration of computer systems, monitoring of the computer systems for breakdown, quality control, and the technological functions of computer network systems, and IT system implementation, cloud computing, computer systems networking in the nature of maintenance of computer network software, integration of computer networks, monitoring of the computer networks for breakdown, quality control, and the technological functions of the computer network, computer workstation and server support in the nature of server software maintenance, hardware and software integration, IT telecommunication technology consultancy, IT telecommunication technology implementation, IT telecommunication technology remote and onsite management, IT telecommunication technology support in the nature of telecommunication technology software maintenance; Computer software consultancy; Computer software consultation; Computer software consulting; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; IT consulting services; Providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; Server hosting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2021 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 3, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |