USPTO serial 88092426
VOCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6283627Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2021
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VOCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Headphones; Audio headphones; Music headphones; Protective cases for audio equipment in the nature of headphones; Stereo headphones | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Dec 4, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MrSpeakers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MrSpeakers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DAN CLARK AUDIO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DAN CLARK AUDIO, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VOCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2024 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2021 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 16, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Dec 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |