USPTO serial 88093196
Serial No. 88093196
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 88093196?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shenzhen Ustellar Technology Ltd.
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Shenzhen Ustellar Technology Ltd.
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Bicycle lights; Diving lights; Electric bulbs; Film stage lighting apparatus; Flashlights; Floodlights; Lamps; Lampshades; Lanterns for lighting; LED lamps; LED light bulbs; Light bulbs for directional signals for vehicles; Lights for vehicles; Outdoor portable lighting products, namely, headlamps; Safety lamps for underground use; Searchlights | ABANDONED | Apr 7, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |