USPTO serial 88093222
DREAMS TO REALTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DREAMS TO REALTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate brokerage | ACTIVE | Nov 8, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 8, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |