USPTO serial 88094413
AOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCLELLAN, MATTHEW D.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Herzelia Pituach, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Tutunjian
JOHN TUTUNJIAN TUTUNJIAN & BITETTO, P.C.401 BROADHOLLOW ROADSUITE 402MELVILLE, NY 11747Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR SELECTING AN ADVERTISEMENT CAMPAIGN TO SERVE TO A MOBILE DEVICE USER USING AN ELECTRONIC AUCTION | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING AND ADVERTISEMENT SERVICES; MOBILE ADVERTISING SERVICES FOR OTHERS; ADVERTISING ON THE INTERNET FOR OTHERS; AD SERVING, NAMELY, PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS ON WEBSITES OR MOBILE APPLICATIONS FOR OTHERS USING SPECIALIZED COMPUTER SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | PROVIDING ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE FOR ADVERTISEMENT PLACEMENT IN A MOBILE DEVICE; HOSTING SERVICES FOR HOSTING COMPUTER LOGIC THAT IS PROVIDED TO MOBILE DEVICES FOR PARTICIPATING IN AN ELECTRONIC AUCTION FOR SELECTING ADVERTISEMENTS TO BE PRESENTED TO MOBILE DEVICE USERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |