Drawing for BETTER COMMUNITIES THROUGH BETTER INFRASTRUCTURE

USPTO serial 88099767

BETTER COMMUNITIES THROUGH BETTER INFRASTRUCTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5797872Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 9, 2019
Examiner
ADEYIGA, ADETAYO JANET
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with BETTER COMMUNITIES THROUGH BETTER INFRASTRUCTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

S. Nathan Gordon

S. Nathan Gordon BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.1901 Sixth Avenue North, Suite 2600BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035inventory management; business consulting services in the field of tracking, management, control and inspection of assets provided to commercial and non-commercial entities and enterprises; collection of business information, namely, the collection and reconciliation of location, condition, maintenance and other information relating to the inventory and assets of commercial and non-commercial entities and enterprises; business consulting in the field of asset and task management, including asset-to-asset, asset-to-task, and task-to-task combinations for othersACTIVEFeb 8, 2017
042computer software design and development for others; consulting services in the field of computer software design and developmentACTIVEFeb 8, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2025NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2025C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 7, 2025EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2025PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Dec 21, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 23, 2024E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2024REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 23, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 27, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2018GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2018GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2018EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Dec 14, 2018CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance