Drawing for ECOSMART LABS

USPTO serial 88100751

ECOSMART LABS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ECOSMART LABS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ashley N. Barendse

ASHLEY N BARENDSE DUNLAP BENNETT & LUDWIG PLLC211 CHURCH ST SELEESBURG, VA 20175UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042design and development of new technology for others in the field of blockchain tokens used to assess, monitior, and neutralize carbon footprints made by corporations and individuals, including by oil, petroleum, jetfuel and other sources of carbon dioxide harmful to the planetABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2019MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 18, 2019ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 18, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 18, 2019OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 4, 2019OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 5, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 7, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance