USPTO serial 88100847
ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA EVERY LAWFULLY CAST VOTE ACCURATELY COUNTED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2019
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, BRITTANY S
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA EVERY LAWFULLY CAST VOTE ACCURATELY COUNTED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Election Integrity Project California, Inc.
Alpine, CA
Other trademarks owned by Election Integrity Project California, Inc.
Election Integrity Project California, Inc.
Alpine, CA
Other trademarks owned by Election Integrity Project California, Inc.
Election Integrity Project California, Inc.
Prescott, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Election Integrity Project California, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jake D. Siciliano
Jake D. Siciliano JDS Law Office, PLLC9249 S Broadway Unit 200 #533Highlands Ranch, CO 80129United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Public policy research services in the field of election fraud | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2010 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing programs about election fraud in order to educate the public about election fraud and providing training to promote action against election fraud | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Election Integrity Project California, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Election Integrity Project California, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Election Integrity Project California, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA EVERY LAWFULLY CAST VOTE ACCURATELY COUNTED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |