Drawing for RAPIDLITE

USPTO serial 88104307

RAPIDLITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'BRIEN, ELIZABETH A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAPIDLITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nathan T. Harris

Nathan T. Harris Lando & Anastasi, LLP60 State Street, 23rd FloorBoston, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Providing emergency medical data in the nature of emergency medical information retrieved from electronic devices and applications to emergency response centers and emergency personnelACTIVE—
045Providing data and information in the field of emergency response obtained from electronic devices and applications to emergency response centers and emergency personnelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 27, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 28, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 28, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 28, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 28, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 10, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2018GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 10, 2018GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 10, 2018CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 3, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance