USPTO serial 88110831
HELM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HELM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing online business management services and advice in the nature of accounting, budgeting, cash flow management and financial planning | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, receiving financial information about business and non-profit organizations, generating modified, applied and summarized financial information and providing same back to organizations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in forecasting, managing, and budgeting for their cash flow, for use in automating their bookkeeping and accounting, for use in managing their financial affairs and for use in making automatic payments to vendors and suppliers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 14, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |