CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for THE CLEEN HEMP PROJECT

USPTO serial 88111752

THE CLEEN HEMP PROJECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CLEEN HEMP PROJECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shreya Biswas Ley

Shreya Biswas Ley LAYROOTS LLC7511 GREENWOOD AVE N UNIT 4114SEATTLE, WA 98103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail store services featuring goods made from agricultural byproducts, namely, hemp; online retail store services featuring papers, stationery, clothing, textiles, soaps, balms, and food products; all of the foregoing containing ingredients from the mature stalks and sterilized seeds of hemp with only naturally occurring CBDACTIVE—
041Online blog and online non-downloadable articles featuring information on environmental stewardship, agricultural industry, and hemp-related productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2023EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2022TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 12, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2022EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 15, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2022TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 6, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 5, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 23, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 21, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2021TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 7, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 24, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 25, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 24, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 5, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 15, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance