USPTO serial 88115932
DIRECT.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, ALEXANDRA M.
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIRECT.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig M. Scott
Craig M. Scott HINCKLEY ALLEN & SNYDER LLP28 STATE STREETBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Bank tendering, namely, tendering of money; Banking; Banking and financing services; Banking consultation; Banking services featuring the provision of certificates of deposit; Banking services provided by mobile telephone connections; Check acceptance services; Check cashing; Check payment guarantee services; Check processing; Check recovery services; Check verification; Checking account services; Debit card transaction processing services; Debit card transaction processing services provided via mobile applications and a web site; Lending consultant services; ATM banking services; Commercial lending services; Consumer lending services; Electronic banking via a global computer network; Electronic debit card transaction processing; Financial information provided by electronic means in the field of lending; Financial services, namely, electronic remote check deposit services; Financial services, namely, money lending; Home banking; Issuance of bank checks; Issuance of travelers' checks; Merchant banking services; Mortgage banking; Mortgage banking services, namely, origination, acquisition, servicing, securitization and brokerage of mortgage loans; Mortgage lending; On-line banking services; Online banking services accessible by means of downloadable mobile applications; Providing bank account information by telephone; Providing banking information; Providing a website featuring information in the field of banking; Real estate lending services; Savings bank services; Telephone banking services | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |