Drawing for LEGENDS

USPTO serial 88122523

LEGENDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEGENDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rochelle D. Alpert

ROCHELLE D. ALPERT MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPONE MARKET, SPEAR STREET TOWERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012License plate frames; Trailer hitch coversACTIVE—
018Wallets; Purses; Duffle bags; Backpacks; Luggage; Suitcases; Reusable shopping bags; Animal leashes; Collars for animals; Pet clothingACTIVE—
022TentsACTIVE—
024Plastic, fabric, vinyl and nylon flags; Plastic, fabric, vinyl and nylon bannersACTIVE—
025T-shirts; Long sleeved shirts; Tank tops; Sweatshirts; Hooded sweatshirts; Polo shirts; Button down shirts; Sweaters; Athletic sweaters; Pullovers; Rainwear; Sports jerseys; Headwear; Socks; Scarves; Sleepwear; Shorts; Pants; Bathing suits; Footwear; Sandals; Belts for clothing; Ties for clothing; Jackets, Sweatpants; Gloves; Dresses, all featuring and for promoting spring professional football teamACTIVE—
027Car mats, namely, floor mats for use in carsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 8, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 18, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 21, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 8, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 4, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance