Drawing for UNO

USPTO serial 88123168

UNO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GALANTE, JOSHUA MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020IDENTITY PLATES, NOT OF METAL; PILLOWS; HEAD SUPPORTING PILLOWS; INFLATABLE PILLOWS; LATEX PILLOWS; NECK PILLOWS; NECK-SUPPORTING PILLOWS; U-SHAPED PILLOWS; BEAN BAG PILLOWS; TRAVEL PILLOWSACTIVESep 28, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 7, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 7, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 10, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 23, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 31, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 31, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 24, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 24, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance