USPTO serial 88128521
JUSTICE AT WORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOO, JEANE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUSTICE AT WORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Curtis Harrington
CURTIS HARRINGTON HARRINGTON & HARRINGTON - PATENTAXP.O. BOX 91719LONG BEACH, CA 90809-1719UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, organizing, developing, arranging and conducting classes, classroom instruction, continuing education for attorneys, courses, conferences, educational study groups, interviews, instruction, lectures, panel discussions, ongoing television and radio talk shows, seminars, teleseminars, teleclasses, video conferences, workshops, in the field of all areas of employment and labor law, criminal workplace detection and analysis, standards and practices to assure legal compliance, laws governing employee and consumer rights, workplace insurance claims and coverage, independent contractors classification, overtime requirements, unlawful workplace harassment, unlawful hostile work environment, unlawful termination, discrimination related to race, religion, gender, age, disability, national origin, and pregnancy, title VII compliance, section 1983 violations, illegal genetic testing, executive compensation, severance negotiation, pre-employment contracts, post-employment contracts, independent contractor employment contracts, commission disputes, unpaid wages, workplace sexual harassment, workplace and work related sexual assault, workplace discrimination, sex discrimination, equal pay rights, employee rights, protected workplace activity, whistleblower claims, false claims acts, Georgia false claims act, fair credit reporting act violations, consumer reports, background checks, Fair Labor Standards Act violations, wage theft, tip theft, women's rights related to pregnancy discrimination and equal pay, civil rights, Family Medical Leave Act, unlawful retaliation, human resources, risk management, and distribution of course and training material in connection therewith; writing of educational texts, outlines, articles other than for advertising or publicity, namely, providing on-line non-downloadable articles in the field of employment and labor law; creating and developing educational syllabi for others, creating and providing online newsletters, creating and developing educational curriculum for others, publication of texts, books, and journals of others, all of the foregoing in the field of all areas of employment and labor law; providing information about educational opportunities, continuing legal education courses, and business education courses | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |