USPTO serial 88128779
DYNAMIC CONCEPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2025
- Examiner
- NOBLE, ANNIE MELISSA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with DYNAMIC CONCEPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saguenay, Quebec, CA
Saguenay, Quebec, CA
Saguenay, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anton Leonov
Anton Leonov Trademark Garden, PLLC3104 E Camelback Rd #2373Phoenix, AZ 85016United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design, engineering, and testing of industrial machinery used in the field of aluminum and magnesium casting, specifically in relation to direct chill casting machines and ancillaries, sow casting machines, re-melt ingot machines, metal filtration machines, automated molten metal level control machines and their software, metal transfer siphoning apparatus, metal transfer and distribution equipment; Design, engineering, and testing of industrial machinery used in the field of aluminum and magnesium casting, specifically in relation to launder, distribution launder, crucible, siphoning machines and tilting table, molten metal high level detection apparatus, molds, mold testing apparatus, dross cooling apparatus, rodding room equipment; Design, engineering, and testing of industrial machinery used in the field of aluminum and magnesium casting, specifically in relation to stub preheating, stub inspection, anode and cathode inspection machines, automated stub cutting and welding machines, cast iron automated pouring machines, anode marking machines, metal refining equipment; Design, engineering, and testing of industrial machinery used in the field of aluminum and magnesium casting, specifically in relation to metal grain refiners, filters for removing contaminants from melt metals and degassers, rod line bar cutters, rod grabbing apparatus, casting wheel tooling, ingots laser marking apparatus, billet laser marking apparatus, slab laser marking apparatus, molten metal skimmers; Design, engineering, and testing of industrial machinery used in the field of aluminum and magnesium casting, specifically in relation to furnaces and control systems; Design, engineering, and testing of industrial machinery used in the field of aluminum and magnesium casting, specifically in relation to preheater, tilting and stationary furnaces, metal and scrap preheating furnaces, automated temperature measurement apparatus, automated molten metal level measurement apparatus; Technical supervision in the field of commissioning and start-up of industrial machinery used in the industry of aluminum and magnesium casting, specifically in relation to direct chill casting machines and ancillaries, sow casting machines, re-melt ingot machines, metal filtration machines, automated molten metal level control machines and their software, metal transfer siphoning apparatus, metal transfer and distribution equipment, launder, distribution launder, crucible, siphoning machines and tilting table, molten metal high level detection apparatus, molds, mold testing apparatus, dross cooling apparatus, rodding room equipment, stub preheating, stub inspection, anode and cathode inspection machines, automated stub cutting and welding machines, cast iron automated pouring machines, anode marking machines, metal refining equipment, metal grain refiners, filters for removing contaminants from melt metals and degassers, rod line bar cutters, rod grabbing apparatus, casting wheel tooling, ingots laser marking apparatus, billet laser marking apparatus, slab laser marking apparatus, molten metal skimmers, furnaces and control systems, preheater, tilting and stationary furnaces, metal and scrap preheating furnaces, automated temperature measurement apparatus, automated molten metal level measurement apparatus; Engineering services in the nature of technical project planning and design of machines, process and installations used for producing aluminum and magnesium ingots billets and slabs; Analysis and technical evaluation of machines, process and installations used for producing aluminum and magnesium ingots billets and slabs to determine their technical performance and their need to be upgraded | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2025 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 21, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |