USPTO serial 88130586
DELTA-9 TECHNOLOGIES BY DR. HARTSEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DELTA-9 TECHNOLOGIES BY DR. HARTSEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ashley J. Earle
ASHLEY J. EARLE DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP255 E 5TH STREETSUITE 1900CINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Botanical compounds extracting machines, all the foregoing not for use in processing or extracting any oils, extracts or derivatives from the plant Cannabis sativa L with a delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Plant concentrates extracting machines all the foregoing not for use in processing or extracting any oils, extracts or derivatives from the plant Cannabis sativa L with a delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Extracting machines for botanical extraction and refinement, all the foregoing not for use in processing or extracting any oils, extracts or derivatives from the plant Cannabis sativa L with a delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Extracting machines for botanical oil production, all the foregoing not for use in processing or extracting any oils, extracts or derivatives from the plant Cannabis sativa L with a delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development and testing of botanical extraction methods, all the foregoing not including botanical extraction methods and testing relating to the plant Cannabis sativa L with a delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Research and development of advanced botanical extraction technologies and methods, all the foregoing not including botanical extraction technologies relating to the plant Cannabis sativa L with a delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Delta Team Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DELTA TEAM HOLDINGS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DELTA TEAM HOLDINGS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DELTA-9 TECHNOLOGIES BY DR. HARTSEL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |