Drawing for ALPHA PROJECT

USPTO serial 88133238

ALPHA PROJECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LIEBL, ALEXANDRA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALPHA PROJECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joshua J. Richman

Joshua J. Richman IPLA, LLP4445 Eastgate Mall, Suite 200San Diego, CA 92121UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, short and long sleeved shirts, jackets, pants, shorts, underwear, and base layers; Hats; Wetsuits; Wetsuit hoods; Wetsuit gloves; Wetsuit tops made of neoprene; Swimwear, namely, swimsuits, swim trunks, bathing suits, bikinisACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 23, 2020ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Nov 13, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 15, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 12, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 12, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 12, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 6, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Sep 6, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Sep 6, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Aug 29, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 29, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 31, 2019GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 31, 2019GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 31, 2019CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 31, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 29, 2019PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Jan 8, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 8, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 4, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 29, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance