Drawing for GRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY

USPTO serial 88133273

GRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5893402Status 701Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 22, 2019
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.

Status 701: Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary.

Need help with GRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tyson York Winarski

Tyson York Winarski THE WINARSKI FIRM428 E Susan LaneTempe, AZ 85288United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Charitable services, namely, promoting volunteer programs and community service projects of others; on-line retail gift store services; retail gift store services; providing a website that promotes public awareness of art, botany, biology and the conservation of natural resources for othersACTIVENov 1, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2026NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 20268.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Mar 9, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 24, 2025ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 21, 2025ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2024REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2019R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Sep 13, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2019AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2019CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2019IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 6, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 2, 2019AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 2, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 31, 2019EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 31, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 31, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 2019GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 10, 2019GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 10, 2019CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 8, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance