Drawing for HYBRID INFLATOR

USPTO serial 88134290

HYBRID INFLATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYBRID INFLATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nathan P. Koenig

NATHAN P KOENIG BAY AREA TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP PC2171 E FRANCISCO BLVD SUITE LSAN RAFAEL, CA 94901UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Automobile tire inflator sealersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 3, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 3, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 15, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 22, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 5, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 5, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 23, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 23, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance