USPTO serial 88134335
FACE LOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GALANTE, JOSHUA MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FACE LOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntingdon, TN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Security alarm controllers; Security devices, namely, mobile image projection device for displaying retinal images; Security surveillance robots; Electronic security and surveillance devices, namely, electronic security tags and labels, acoustic tags, magnetic tags | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer security service, namely, hard drive erasure; Computer security services in the nature of administering digital certificates; Computer security services in the nature of administering digital keys; Computer security services in the nature of providing authentication, issuance, validation and revocation of digital certificates; Computer security services, namely, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud, mobile or network resources based on assigned credentials; Computer security services, namely, restricting unauthorized access to data, systems, services, or networks; Computer security services, namely, restricting unauthorized network access by token, password, or physical access; Computer security threat analysis for protecting data; Data encryption services for providing security and anonymity for electronically transmitted credit card transactions; Development of customized software for others for use in risk assessment, information security, business analysis, audit and audit planning, and sales management; Development of software for secure network operations; Maintenance of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; Providing a secure electronic online system featuring technology which allows multi-factor authentication based on facial match; Providing a secured-access, members only website featuring technology that gives members the ability to process financial transactions based on facial recognition; Providing a website featuring technology enabling users to remotely view, monitor, program, operate and control large and small appliances, electrical systems and security systems in homes, offices and vehicles; Providing a website that features technology that enables the secure exchange of information by users; Recording software protection programs and security programs onto magnetic media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |