USPTO serial 88134537
SOFTWARE DEFINED FABRIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 2021
- Examiner
- PIERCE, ALEXANDRA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SOFTWARE DEFINED FABRIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore A. Breiner
Theodore A. Breiner BREINER & BREINER LLC115 NORTH HENRY STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for networking a data center | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 11, 2021 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 30, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |