USPTO serial 88135739
TELEMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 26, 2020
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with TELEMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $850
Owner
Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
Ostfildern, DE
Other trademarks owned by Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
Ostfildern, DE
Other trademarks owned by Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
Ostfildern, DE
Other trademarks owned by Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin Geissler
Martin Geissler MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Tactical robots for ordinance detection and disposal; security surveillance robots for explosive ordinance detection and disposal; detectors for the detection of explosives, mines and ammunition; robotic controllers and programmable calculators for explosive ordinance detection and disposal; metal detectors; non-medical x-ray devices for explosive ordinance detection | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2009 |
| 012 | Remote-controlled land vehicles for explosive ordinance detection and disposal | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
- Other trademarks owned by Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
- Other trademarks owned by Telerob Gesellschaft fuer Fernhantierungstechnik mbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named TELEMAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2026 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 1, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |