USPTO serial 88136449
EMERGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMERGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley K. Groff
BRADLEY K. GROFF GARDNER GROFF GREENWALD & VILLANUEVA, PC2018 POWERS FERRY RD STE 800ATLANTA, GA 30339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Accessories for mobile and handheld electronic devices, namely, smartwatch wristbands, armbands specially adapted for personal mobile and handheld electronic devices, namely, cellphones, smartphones, smart watches, MP3 players, handheld computers, and tablet computers; stands for supporting mobile and handheld electronic devices, namely, cellphones, smartphones, smart watches, MP3 players, handheld computers, and tablet computers; storage pockets specially adapted for attachment to mobile and handheld electronic devices, namely, cellphones, smartphones, smart watches, MP3 players, handheld computers, and tablet computers; finger grips, straps, and holders for mobile and handheld electronic devices, namely, cellphones, smartphones, smart watches, MP3 players, handheld computers, and tablet computers; holsters for mobile and handheld electronic devices, namely, cellphones, smartphones, smart watches, MP3 players, handheld computers, and tablet computers; cell phone battery chargers; battery chargers for use with electronic mobile devices; hand grips, stands, and mounts adapted for handheld electronic devices, namely, cellphones, smartphones, smart watches, MP3 players, handheld computers, and tablet computers; cases for electronic devices, namely, cases for cellphones, smartphones, smart watches, MP3 players, handheld computers, and tablet computers; computer carrying cases; laptop carrying cases; notebook computer carrying cases; cases including an auxiliary power source for personal electronic devices, namely, cellphones, smartphones, smart watches, MP3 players, handheld computers, and tablet computers; protective covers and cases for mobile and handheld electronic devices, namely, cellphones, smartphones, smart watches, MP3 players, handheld computers, and tablet computers; screen protectors in the nature of protective sheets of plastic film specially adapted for electronic devices with screens, namely, cellphones, smartphones, smart watches, MP3 players, handheld computers, and tablet computers; virtual reality headsets and viewers for use with mobile and handheld electronic devices, namely, cellphones, smartphones, smart watches, MP3 players, handheld computers, and tablet computers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | PMSD | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - DENIED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |