Drawing for MUSE

USPTO serial 88136496

MUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOZAK, EVIN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lindsay Cohen Schneider

Lindsay Cohen Schneider BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP211 NORTH BROADWAY, SUITE 3600ST. LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Edible ingredients in the nature of edible ink and binder for use with three dimensional (3D) printing of food; edible printing ink; edible printing compositions and edible printing powders and liquids, each of the foregoing in the nature of printing compositionsACTIVE—
007Three dimensional (3D) printers for foodACTIVE—
030Edible ingredients in the nature of flavored and unflavored powdered sugar and confectionary dry mix containing sugar for use with three dimensional (3D) printing of foodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2019MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 30, 2019ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 29, 2019EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 11, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance