USPTO serial 88136749
SMARTSSD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMARTSSD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR
Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jun-Young E. Jeon
DREW WILSON LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLPP O BOX 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BLANK DIGITAL STORAGE MEDIA; STORAGE DEVICES IN THE NATURE OF MEMORY MEDIA FOR STORING INFORMATION COLLECTED FROM A HOST COMPUTER SYSTEM; MEMORY CARDS; COMPUTER MEMORY HARDWARE; SOLID STATE DRIVES; DATA STORAGE DEVICES, NAMELY, BLANK SOLID STATE DEVICES FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTER DATA AND PROCESSING CIRCUITRY; ACCELERATOR COMPONENTS OR ADD-ONS TO SOLID STATE DRIVES, NAMELY, INTERPOSERS IN THE NATURE OF PROCESSING CIRCUITRY INTERPOSED BETWEEN A HOST COMPUTER SYSTEM AND A DATA STORAGE SYSTEM, COMPUTER NETWORK BRIDGES, AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CHIPS; HARDWARE AND ASSOCIATED CAPABILITIES, NAMELY, COMPUTER HARDWARE ACCESSIBLE OVER A NETWORK; CLOUD-BASED STORAGE DEVICES, NAMELY, BLANK DIGITAL STORAGE MEDIA AND PROCESSING CIRCUITRY; COMPUTER SERVERS; BLANK DIGITAL MEDIA FLASH MEMORY CARDS; DATA STORAGE APPARATUS, NAMELY, BLANK DIGITAL STORAGE MEDIA AND PROCESSING CIRCUITRY; SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORIES; SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY UNITS; SOLID STATE DRIVES WITH BUILT-IN COMPUTING RESOURCES; SOLID STATE DRIVES WITH ATTACHED COMPUTING RESOURCES; SOLID STATE DRIVES WITH CUSTOMIZABLE COMPUTING RESOURCES; SOLID STATE DRIVES WITH PROGRAMMABLE COMPUTING RESOURCES; SOLID STATE DRIVES THAT ALLOW FOR A WIDE VARIETY OF ACCELERATED COMPUTATIONAL USES; IN-STORAGE COMPUTING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, SYSTEMS COMPRISING BLANK DIGITAL STORAGE MEDIA AND PROCESSING CIRCUITRY; IN-STORAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, SYSTEMS COMPRISING BLANK DIGITAL STORAGE MEDIA AND PROCESSING CIRCUITRY; DOMAIN SPECIFIC COMPUTE AND STORAGE SYSTEMS, NAMELY, BLANK DIGITAL STORAGE MEDIA AND PROCESSING CIRCUITRY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 28, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 28, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 28, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |