Drawing for BREEYOTA

USPTO serial 88138437

BREEYOTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADCLIFF, BRENT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BREEYOTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean S. Wooden

SEAN S. WOODEN KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP2900 K STREET, N.W.NORTH TOWER, SUITE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5118

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Decision support software, namely, software providing medical and healthcare decision supportACTIVE—
044Providing medical assistance in the nature of decision support, namely, medical and healthcare decision support servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 5, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 12, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 11, 2019GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 11, 2019GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 11, 2019CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 11, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance