Drawing for BOCCA DOLCE

USPTO serial 88138756

BOCCA DOLCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DIBLE, JONATHON I
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOCCA DOLCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amber M. Underhill

AMBER M UNDERHILL WARNER NORCROSS + JUDD LLP150 OTTAWA AVE NW , 1500 WARNER BUILDINGGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Chocolate confectionsACTIVENov 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 3, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 3, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 18, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 28, 2020RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
May 7, 2020GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 7, 2020GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 7, 2020CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 18, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 6, 2020RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Jan 6, 2020RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2020RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Dec 5, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 30, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance